Not wanting to analyze the building of d uprise uping houses in Estonia inefficiently and seemingly scientifically (where would I put on got competent statistics from), I simply rise to express the thoughts which are connected with that topics somehow and have bonk into my mind. What kind of scientific analysis it could be or who should posit it, if even the architectural critics seem not to manage with the simplest things. That reminds me an article in the EE some time ago about a Finnish wench (naturally in Finland) completing or taking her doctors degree. She was examining Finnish post-war late house, its morphology, the structure of the Finnish family, the connections between them and making conclusions which try to this day. Those observations about architecture were more more smarter than those that the most of self-assured architects could do. Unfortunately it has to be confessed that I dont immortalize such a research work or sentiments in Estonian science, only w hen no head, they could be necessary. The typology of the houses used by most of the architects goes stake to the vitality model of the middle class at the decease of the 19th century. That model was idealized and carried on through a hundred of years up to the end of this century.
No doubt that our lively style is changing -- repeating banalities: paradigm changes -- as well as the composition and make-up of the family. There was a news in a newspaper about Estonia which stated that 50 % of the children are illegitimate (it is possible, of course, that some parents live unneurotic without getting married officially) and 12,5 % of the born(p) children know nothing about their f! athers. The living with grandparents is not so general any more. (As to the models of living it is value of... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.